She said: “The diversity in design specification, components, materials and operational environments and condition can complicate production. OEM´s might specify blades with different lengths, profiles, or raw material weight fractions, to adapt to their own specific requirements. These range from thin, narrow profiles with several kilometres of material to thicker, larger plates for added rigidity.
“Offshore blades, for example, are often more than 100m and must withstand immense loads. This added rigidity helps prevent excessive bending during operation, which could result in the blade striking the turbine tower. All designs must meet consistent performance standards, including aerodynamic efficiency, strength, and fatigue resistance, provided in general Standard like IEC 61400-5:2020 and DNV-ST-0376. Nevertheless, each design requires customised materials, production processes and extensive testing, leading to higher costs and longer production timelines.”
To address these challenges, APQP4Wind was established to standardise quality assurance practices across the wind energy sector. This non-profit organisation employs principles from Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) to streamline product development and approval processes. APQP4Wind aims to propagate consistency, reduce the cost of non-quality and accelerate time to market by standardising documentation, testing, and quality assurance.
Testing and qualification
Ms Vázquez continued: “Qualification and testing of wind turbine blades are crucial to ensure they meet industry standards. Prominent and certified testing facilities in Germany and China are integral to this process, performing extensive evaluations of turbine component materials and designs. For instance, testing of the carbon spar cap supplied by Exel involves mechanical and fatigue examinations conducted by these external laboratories to validate compliance with the OEMs’ specifications.
“These rigorous assessments validate that materials can withstand operational stresses and environmental conditions. Materials are tested for their durability and performance under simulated operational conditions. These include exposure to freezing, thawing, and high humidity to evaluate their resistance to environmental degradation.”
She explained: “After this, a pre-production approval process (PPAP) typically lasts three to six months, involving quality and paperwork checks on three to 30 blades. Delays can occur if customers need to adapt their manufacturing processes for new materials. Certification from bodies like DNV requires additional blade testing, also adding time and costs. This means that transitioning from initial requirements to serial production can take up to three years.”
“Navigating these challenges demands experience and innovation from the blade component manufacturers. Exel Composites, a pultrusion leader, works closely with turbine OEMs to ensure compliance with standards. This includes customised manufacturing processes and qualification tests, ensuring each blade meets performance and safety criteria.”
As the sector continues to evolve, embracing standardisation is key to giving blade manufacturers confidence in supplied components’ reliability, safety, and efficacy. To learn more about how Exel Composites is pioneering the development of composites for wind power, visit Excel Composite’s website here.
Patricia Vázquez, carbon key account manager for wind energy at Exel Composites.
